We have no experience in the practical world that a thing is created automatically.
Is there an argument for the existence of God? The question of whether there is a conclusive argument for the existence of God has been debated throughout history, with exceedingly intelligent people taking both sides of the dispute. Karl Marx asserted that anyone believing in God must have a mental disorder that caused invalid thinking.
The philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche bluntly said that faith equates to not wanting to know what is true. The voices of these three figures from history along with others are simply now parroted by a new generation of atheists who claim that a belief in God is intellectually unwarranted. Is this truly the case?
Is belief in God a rationally unacceptable position to hold?
Is there a logical and reasonable argument for the existence of God? Outside of referencing the Bible, can a case for the existence of God be made that refutes the positions of both the old and new atheists and gives sufficient warrant for believing in a Creator?
The answer is, yes, it can. Moreover, in demonstrating the validity of an argument for the existence of God, the case for atheism is shown to be intellectually weak. To make an argument for the existence of God, we must start by asking the right questions. We begin with the most basic metaphysical question: Reality is an illusion.
Reality is self-existent eternal. Reality was created by something that is self-existent. So, which is the most plausible solution? So the possibility of reality being an illusion is eliminated.
Next is the option of reality being self-created. The possibility of reality being self-created is one of those types of statements for the simple reason that something cannot be prior to itself. If you created yourself, then you must have existed prior to you creating yourself, but that simply cannot be.
Now we are left with only two choices—an eternal reality or reality being created by something that is eternal: The 18th-century theologian Jonathan Edwards summed up this crossroads: But the question now is, where does the evidence lead? Does the evidence point to matter before mind or mind before matter?
To date, all key scientific and philosophical evidence points away from an eternal universe and toward an eternal Creator. From a scientific standpoint, honest scientists admit the universe had a beginning, and whatever has a beginning is not eternal. In other words, whatever has a beginning has a cause, and if the universe had a beginning, it had a cause.
All prove the universe is not eternal. Further, the laws that surround causation speak against the universe being the ultimate cause of all we know for this simple fact: This being true, no atheist can explain how an impersonal, purposeless, meaningless, and amoral universe accidentally created beings us who are full of personality and obsessed with purpose, meaning, and morals.
Such a thing, from a causation standpoint, completely refutes the idea of a natural universe birthing everything that exists. So in the end, the concept of an eternal universe is eliminated. Mill not a Christian summed up where we have now come to: Or to put it in a logical set of statements: Can we infer things about Him from what He created?In these arguments they claim to demonstrate that all human experience and action (even the condition of unbelief, itself) is a proof for the existence of God, because God's existence is the necessary condition of their intelligibility.
This Theologian Has An Answer To Atheists’ Claims That Evil Disproves God Taken at face value, the problem of evil appears to be a devastatingly convincing argument against the existence of the.
Philosophical discussion of arguments for the existence of God appeared to have become extinct during the heyday of logical positivism and ordinary language philosophy.
However, since the mids, there has been a resurgence of interest in these arguments.
Apr 18, · Here we present five arguments in favor of the existence of God, and the counterargument for it. Feel free to comment on the veracity (or your opinion of) each but remember to keep calm and argue reasonably. While the facts are true, the arguments do not come close to proving the existence of the biblical God. Some of the arguments seem stronger; I happen to think that irreducible complexity and information in DNA are strong confirmations of biblical creation. Moral arguments for God’s existence form a diverse family of arguments that reason from some feature of morality or the moral life to the existence of God, usually understood as a morally good creator of the universe.
Much of the discussion has focused on. While the facts are true, the arguments do not come close to proving the existence of the biblical God. Some of the arguments seem stronger; I happen to think that irreducible complexity and information in DNA are strong confirmations of biblical creation.
Apr 18, · Here we present five arguments in favor of the existence of God, and the counterargument for it. Feel free to comment on the veracity (or your opinion of) each but remember to keep calm and argue reasonably.
Arguments for God's Existence Arguments for the existence of God come in many different forms; some draw on history, some on science, some on personal experience, and some on philosophy.
The primary focus of this site is the philosophical arguments—the ontological argument, the first cause argument, the argument from design, and the moral.